Ads

..

Saturday, March 14, 2015

Oops! Thomas Retzlaff Outs Himself As Johnny Swift

Posted By: ZiLe Ohai - 2:10 PM








The following comments by Thomas Retlaff's alias Johnny Swift were taken from Disqus.

The google cache of the bio page for the Johnny Swift account has Facebook and Twitter links. The Facebook link is dead but the Twitter link goes to Retzlaff's @klansmann account. Check it out here. 






Discussion on Radar Online 102 comments
Kitchen Nightmares Waitress Speaks Out On ‘Hated’ Restaurant Owners: ‘The Show Brou…



Johnny Swift 2 years ago

I would rape her if I ever met her.





1
View in discussion





Discussion on Radar Online 78 comments
Kitchen Nightmares’ Controversial Couple Changes Their Tip Policy — Now Paying Less!



Johnny Swift 2 years ago


I am curious as to why no one has yet murdered these two fools. If I worked there, I would have murdered them by now. seriously. and then chopped them up in the kitchen.





View in discussion







Discussion on AdamSteinbaugh.com 58 comments
Revenge Porn: YouGotPosted Held in Contempt, Loses Case to Bullyville




Johnny Swift 2 years ago


Who cares about damages when you are judgment proof. Especially when you live in a state that is very protective of judgment-debtors (such as Texas or Florida).





View in discussion





Discussion on AdamSteinbaugh.com 7 comments
California Senate to Consider Bill Criminalizing Revenge Porn



Johnny Swift 2 years ago


lol. that's why this bill is a joke and nothing but political grandstanding.





View in discussion






Johnny Swift 2 years ago

Adam, how do you respond to this?


This is a stupid law. If I own the pictures (either cuz I took them myself or cuz u sent them to me), then why can't I do whatever I want to with MY PROPERTY?


It is not against the law to put someone's name & info on the internet. All kinds of "people finder" websites do this. Nor is it illegal to put someone's picture on the internet. But when you combine the two, it somehow is illegal? That makes no sense.


The Govt has no business telling me what to do with MY property!!


Copyright law is well settled in American and international law. This law would upend that. Plus, it would create a prior restraint on someone's speech based simply on the assumption that someone's feelings might be hurt.


Content-based restriction of speech must survive strict scrutiny. This law could not survive a strict scrutiny review. Preventing hurt feelings is not a compelling governmental reason, otherwise we will need a lot more laws on the books. See U.S. v. Playboy Entertainment Group, 529 U.S. 803 (2000) (Government's interest in criminalizing speech that inflicts emotional distress is not a compelling one).


See also U.S. v. Cassidy, __ F.Supp.2d __, 2011 WL 6260872 (U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland 2011).


It is not the job of the DA or police to be baby sitters or life coaches.


see more




View in discussion







Discussion on HEADLINES & GLOBAL NEWS 19 comments
Osaka Mayor Toru Hashimoto Says Wartime Sex Slaves Were 'Necessary' : World



Johnny Swift maryyugo 2 years ago

rape is too sex. every time I rape a girl, I'm having sex with her. fool!





1 View in discussion





Johnny Swift 2 years ago

I think having sex slaves are necessary, too. I just wish I had some.





View in discussion







Discussion on HEADLINES & GLOBAL NEWS 62 comments
Australian Man Dead for 40 Minutes Brought Back to Life By New Resuscitation Techniqu…




Johnny Swift 2 years ago

this guy was never dead. it would be more accurate to say the heart stopped beating and that a machine took over instead. As long as blood is being pumped and a machine breathes for you, you can stay like that forever. His situation is no different than people with mechanical hearts. He just happened to be unconscious while it went on. The "magic" was in having that machine nearby.


see more




1 View in discussion







Discussion on VentureBeat 1 comments
Florida takes major steps towards making revenge porn a felony



Johnny Swift 2 years ago

Florida didn't do a god damn thing. This Bill was nothing more than a cheap publicity stunt that died in committee.


This is a stupid law. If I own the pictures (either cuz I took them myself or cuz u sent them to me), then why can't I do whatever I want to with MY PROPERTY?


It is not against the law to put someone's name & info on the internet. All kinds of "people finder" websites do this. Nor is it illegal to put someone's picture on the internet. But when you combine the two, it somehow is illegal? That makes no sense.


The Govt has no business telling me what to do with MY property!!


Copyright law is well settled in American and international law. This law would upend that. Plus, it would create a prior restraint on someone's speech based simply on the assumption that someone's feelings might be hurt.


Content-based restriction of speech must survive strict scrutiny. This law could not survive a strict scrutiny review. Preventing hurt feelings is not a compelling governmental reason, otherwise we will need a lot more laws on the books. See U.S. v. Playboy Entertainment Group, 529 U.S. 803 (2000) (Government's interest in criminalizing speech that inflicts emotional distress is not a compelling one).


See also U.S. v. Cassidy, __ F.Supp.2d __, 2011 WL 6260872 (U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland 2011).


It is not the job of the DA or police to be baby sitters or life coaches.


see more




1 View in discussion







Discussion on VentureBeat 8 comments
Accusations of child porn and extortion fail to stop revenge porn site operator



Johnny Swift 2 years ago


This is a stupid law. If I own the pictures (either cuz I took them myself or cuz u sent them to me), then why can't I do whatever I want to with MY PROPERTY?


It is not against the law to put someone's name & info on the internet. All kinds of "people finder" websites do this. Nor is it illegal to put someone's picture on the internet. But when you combine the two, it somehow is illegal? That makes no sense.


The Govt has no business telling me what to do with MY property!!


Copyright law is well settled in American and international law. This law would upend that. Plus, it would create a prior restraint on someone's speech based simply on the assumption that someone's feelings might be hurt.


Content-based restriction of speech must survive strict scrutiny. This law could not survive a strict scrutiny review. Preventing hurt feelings is not a compelling governmental reason, otherwise we will need a lot more laws on the books. See U.S. v. Playboy Entertainment Group, 529 U.S. 803 (2000) (Government's interest in criminalizing speech that inflicts emotional distress is not a compelling one).


See also U.S. v. Cassidy, __ F.Supp.2d __, 2011 WL 6260872 (U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland 2011).


It is not the job of the DA or police to be baby sitters or life coaches.


see more




1 View in discussion







Discussion on CNN 3109 comments
Brother of 8-year-old California girl arrested in her stabbing death



Johnny Swift 2 years ago

In case you idiots forgot, this case was NOT a sex case. It never was about sex, so investigating sex offenders was a waste of time. In ANY murder case, the main suspects are the people who know you and/or have a beef with you, not random strangers.





View in discussion





Johnny Swift Johnny Swift 2 years ago

In case you forgot, this case was NOT a sex crime. It was a murder crime. Sex had nothing to do with it.





14 View in discussion





Johnny Swift david ornm 2 years ago

uh, no. The likely suspects in ANY murder investigation are the people that know you and/or have a beef with you (i.e. family members or friends). Not random folks.







Discussion on Click2Houston 37 comments
Smuggled phones get inmates on Facebook



Johnny Swift 2 years ago

I'm posting this from prison so how about u people mind your own business and STFU?!?





View in discussion







Discussion on The Daily Caller 99 comments
Amanda Bynes tweets topless pics, still swears she isn’t crazy [PHOTOS]



Johnny Swift 2 years ago

if I ever met her I would rape her. for realz.





View in discussion







Discussion on The Daily Caller 185 comments
Eagle Scout faces expulsion and arrest for bringing shotgun to school



Johnny Swift 2 years ago

Does a policy like this make it more or less likely that someone will get shot? I know that if I got expelled, I WOULD definitely come back to school and start shooting just cuz. Seems like a policy like this could just as easily push someone over the edge.





View in discussion







Discussion on Radar Online 94 comments
Parents Of Boston Marathon Bomber’s Widow Katherine Russell List Their Home For Sale,…



Johnny Swift 2 years ago

the house - and the people in it - need to be burned to the ground. this muslim whore needs to die.





17 View in discussion






Discussion on The Daily Caller 1097 comments
Police, ‘anti-gun’ prosecutor clash with soldiers in area around Fort Hood [VIDEO]




Johnny Swift 2 years ago

This jerkoff lives right near me. He lives at 708 N 7th St., Temple, Texas. He is a piece of human garbage. I hope you all will send him a letter telling him what you think of this prosecution!!!!









About ZiLe Ohai

Hi, yes it is really me, ZiLe!

Tag Cloud

Flash Labels by Blogger Widgets

Copyright © 2015

Distributed By Blogger Template | Designed By Templatezy